The Dutch-German Communist Left, represented by means of the German KAPD-AAUD, the Dutch KAPN and the Bulgarian Communist employees get together, separated from the Comintern (1921) on questions like electoralism, trade-unionism, united fronts, the one-party country and anti-proletarian violence. It attracted the ire of Lenin, who wrote his Left Wing Communism, "An childish sickness opposed to the Linkskommunismus," whereas Herman Gorter wrote a well-known reaction in his pamphlet "Reply to Lenin." the current quantity presents the main big heritage thus far of this tendency within the twentieth-century Communist circulation. It covers how the Communist left, with the KAPD-AAU, denounced 'party communism' and 'state capitalism' in Russia; how the German left survived after 1933 within the form of the Dutch GIK and Paul Mattick s councils stream within the united states; and likewise how the Dutch Communistenbond Spartacus persisted to struggle after 1942 for the area energy of the employees councils, as theorised via Pannekoek in his ebook "Workers Councils" (1946)."

Show description

Read or Download The Dutch and German Communist Left 1900-68: Neither Lenin Nor Trotsky Nor Stalin! (Historical Materialism) PDF

Similar Communism books

Reinventing Politics: Eastern Europe from Stalin to Havel

Supplies an account of East eu politics from the time of Soviet domination to the 1989-90 revolutions, and considers the impact of tyranny on East ecu tradition and politics, the possibilities for winning and harmonious improvement within the area, and its courting with the remainder of Europe.

God Is Red: The Secret Story of How Christianity Survived and Flourished in Communist China

In God is purple, chinese language dissident journalist and poet Liao Yiwu—once lauded, later imprisoned, and now celebrated writer of For a music and 100 Songs and The Corpse Walker—profiles the extreme lives of dozens of chinese language Christians, delivering an extraordinary glimpse into the underground global of trust that's taking carry in the formally atheistic country of Communist China.

Mao Zedong: A Life

“Spence attracts upon his broad wisdom of chinese language politics and tradition to create an illuminating photograph of Mao. . . . remarkable. ” (Chicago Tribune)From humble origins within the provinces, Mao Zedong rose to absolute strength, unifying with an iron fist an enormous kingdom torn aside through years of vulnerable management, colonialism, and struggle.

Conversations with Stalin

A memoir by means of the previous vice chairman of Yugoslavia describing 3 visits to Moscow and his encounters there with Stalin. Index. Translated via Michael B. Petrovich.

Additional resources for The Dutch and German Communist Left 1900-68: Neither Lenin Nor Trotsky Nor Stalin! (Historical Materialism)

Show sample text content

A fee for revising the programme was once shaped in contempt of the party’s principles of functioning: the get together committee which determined to appoint the fee did so with out a mandate from the Congress, the single organ with the authority to determine to revise the programme. The fee, less than the impression of the revisionists, proposed not anything lower than altering the Marxist stipulations for becoming a member of the celebration: whereas the celebration used to be to be according to Marx‘s procedure, it used to be no longer essential to settle for the underlying materialist philosophy that allows you to subscribe to it. The door used to be hence open to non-Marxist, non secular or even bourgeois components. The Haarlem Congress of 1907 simply proven the triumph of revisionism. The few Marxists who have been at the fee served in simple terms as a canopy for it, slightly in a position to voice their opinion. The Congress produced a statement situating the occasion within the centre, among Marxism and revisionism: “The programme should be neither orthodox Marxist nor revisionist nor a compromise among the 2 orientations”. (68) As for Marxism as represented through Gorter, Pannekoek and Roland Holst, it can in simple terms be an issue of “private opinion”. (69) The defeat that Marxism suffered at this Congress used to be such that neither Pannekoek nor Van der is going (70) have been in a position to distribute their very own pamphlets opposed to the celebration management. A Congress answer, followed unanimously, used to be even harder than that followed on the Utrecht Congress: the perfect to criticise was once suspended within the identify of 32 the “party unity”. social gathering democracy used to be overtly trampled underfoot with the contract of the good majority of its contributors, who was hoping for an finish to what they observed as mere own quarrels. For the Marxists, in a truly small minority, the alternative was once among capitulation and wrestle: they selected wrestle, to struggle for the previous Marxist orientation of the occasion. They hence based their very own evaluate De Tribune (‘The Tribune’), which used to be to provide the Marxist present a reputation. The start of the ‘Tribunist’ circulate In October 1907 the novel Marxists started to put up their very own ‘social-democratic weekly’. in control of De Tribune have been the longer term leaders of the Tribune corporation: Wijnkoop, Ceton and van Ravesteyn, who had the unconditional aid of the 3rd Amsterdam part, the main innovative one within the occasion. Pannekoek (Leiden part) and Gorter (Bussum part) contributed on a regular basis, delivering essentially the most theoretical and polemical texts. They have been all encouraged by way of the desire of the long run revolution: traditionally it used to be the main beneficial interval ever, with the start of an financial situation which they didn't but examine because the normal predicament of capitalism. Their orientation used to be already anti-parliamentarian: the employees’ fight should still hyperlink up with the overseas fight via liberating it of any parliamentary or nationwide illusions. the purpose was once actually: “Firstly, to unmask the true that means of the treacherous manoeuvres of bourgeois democracy within the nation-states of the perfect to vote and social modifications and secondly to offer staff an idea of the true which means of the foreign state of affairs and the category fight overseas.

Rated 4.79 of 5 – based on 8 votes