By Nancy Bauer

In the advent to The moment Sex, Simone de Beauvoir notes that "a guy by no means starts via developing himself as a person of a undeniable intercourse: his being a guy poses no problem." Nancy Bauer starts her booklet by way of asking: "Then what sort of an issue does being a girl pose?" Bauer's goal is to teach that during answering this question The moment Sex dramatizes the level to which being a girl poses a philosophical challenge.

This publication is a choice for philosophers in addition to feminists to show, or go back to, The moment Sex. Bauer indicates that Beauvoir's magnum opus, written a quarter-century earlier than the advance of latest feminist philosophy, constitutes a meditation at the dating among ladies and philosophy that is still profoundly undervalued. She argues that the intense impression The moment Sex has had on women's lives, then and now, will be traced to Beauvoir's discovery of a brand new solution to philosophize―a approach grounded in her identification as a girl. In supplying a brand new interpretation of The moment Sex, Bauer indicates how philosophy will be politically effective for ladies whereas closing really philosophical.

Show description

Read Online or Download Simone de Beauvoir, Philosophy, and Feminism PDF

Similar Feminism books

Pornography and silence: Culture's revenge against nature

First variation Hardcover (1981) in excellent situation. airborne dirt and dust Jackst exhibits massive volume of wear and tear alongside the sides, a few scuffing and tears of the canopy. besides the fact that, the particular publication is especially fresh & unmarked, there's just one illness within the textual content: web page 111 has a pinhead-size tear alongside the ground of the web page.

The Beauty Myth: How Images of Beauty Are Used Against Women

The bestselling vintage that redefined our view od the connection among attractiveness and feminine identification. In contemporary international, ladies have extra strength, felony reputation, good fortune than ever earlier than. along the obtrusive growth of the women's stream, in spite of the fact that, author and journalist Naomi Wolf is stricken by means of a unique form of social keep an eye on, which, she argues, may perhaps end up simply as restrictive because the conventional snapshot of homemaker and spouse.

The Female Eunuch

The e-book of Germaine Greer's the feminine Eunuch in 1970 was once a landmark occasion, elevating eyebrows and ire whereas making a surprise wave of popularity in ladies world wide with its steadfast statement that sexual liberation is the major to women's liberation. at the present time, Greer's searing exam of the oppression of ladies in modern society is either a major ancient checklist of the place we have been and an incredibly correct treatise on what nonetheless continues to be completed.

I Am Not a Slut: Slut-Shaming in the Age of the Internet

The writer of the groundbreaking paintings Slut! explores the phenomenon of slut-shaming within the age of sexting, tweeting, and “liking. ” She indicates that the sexual double common is extra risky than ever sooner than and provides knowledge and methods for relieving its damaging results on younger women’s lives.

Extra info for Simone de Beauvoir, Philosophy, and Feminism

Show sample text content

This requirement drops correct out of what Beauvoir sees because the stipulations that has to be in position for actual motion to be attainable. the 1st is, as she places it, that I “be allowed to name” (113), the place “allowed” skill, actually, politically accredited to talk. “I will struggle, then,” announces Beauvoir, “against those that want to stifle my voice, hinder me from expressing myself” (113). the second one, heavily similar requirement is that different people be unfastened either to listen to and reply to my allure. hence my very own existential freedom calls for that I struggle for the political freedom of others. Beauvoir writes, The in poor health one who exhausts himself battling opposed to his disease, the slave opposed to slavery, doesn’t fear approximately poetry or astronomy or the perfection of aviation; they first want healthiness, legislations, safety, the unfastened disposition of themselves. … I call for [ Je demande] for males future health, wisdom, future health, legislations, in order that their liberty doesn't devour itself in battling disease, lack of expertise, distress. (114, a hundred and fifteen) it's precise that battling to therapy sickness isn't really inevitably a political act. yet i feel that Beauvoir mentions the ill individual and the slave in a single breath simply because she is imagining that the struggle to remedy illness happens not just at the medical point but additionally on the political point, the place judgements are made approximately tips to allocate assets. For Beauvoir our accountability to take care of one another extends past the methods we will minister to each other in my view, even supposing those are invaluable too. What she is making an attempt to account for is our hesitancy to throw ourselves into the area, to stake ourselves thoroughly, to possess as much as our freedom, to behave. and she or he is making an attempt to discover the concept that we're scared of simply how a lot of the area we are going to, in precept and actually, need to tackle so as to in achieving whatever we will be able to authentically realize as subjectivity. I acknowledged previous that during her knowing of the connection among self and different Beauvoir may be obvious to be extra indebted to Hegel in key respects than to Sartre. That Hegel is on Beauvoir’s brain is apparent from the truth that she drops his identify extra usually (in this ebook within which few names are dropped) than that of the other thinker, together with Sartre. almost the entire handful of situations within which she mentions Hegel are polemical, and that i will glance explicitly at one in every of them in a second. yet I herald Hegel at this actual element simply because i need to say that he's within the historical past of Beauvoir’s dialogue of political “struggle” as an absolute, even metaphysically absolute, ethical necessity. i need to illustrate this through taking a look at the subsequent impressive passage from the ultimate pages of Pyrrhus et Cinéas: we're condemned to failure simply because we're condemned to violence. we're condemned to violence simply because guy is split and against himself, simply because males are separated and against each other: through violence one will make of the kid a guy, of the horde a society. to give up the fight [la lutte] will be to give up transcendence, surrender being.

Rated 4.99 of 5 – based on 42 votes