A transdisciplinary reader on Luce Irigaray’s interpreting and rewriting of historical Greek texts.
In this definitive reader, favourite students ponder how Luce Irigaray reads the vintage discourse of Western metaphysics and likewise how she is learn inside of and by contrast discourse. Her go back to “the Greeks,” via options of deconstructing, demythifying, reconstructing, and remythifying, isn't a nostalgic go back to the ideality of Hellenocentric antiquity, yet quite an affirmatively severe revisiting of this ideality. Her power go back and affective bond to historic Greek trademarks, mythos, and tragedy sheds gentle on a few of the main complicated epistemological matters in modern idea, corresponding to the workings of feedback, the language of politics and the politics of language, the potential for social and symbolic transformation, the a number of mediations among metropolitan and postcolonial contexts of concept and perform, the query of the opposite, and the functionality of the female in Western metaphysics. With a foreword via Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak and a bankruptcy by way of Irigaray responding to her commentators, this publication is an crucial textual content for these in social idea, comparative literature, or classics.
“This isn't any doubt a state of the art edited assortment in an effort to make an enormous contribution no longer purely to present Irigaray scholarship and to the fields of feminism, gender and queer reviews yet, extra greatly, in modern severe and cultural theory.” — Year’s paintings in severe and Cultural Theory
“The actual power, and infrequent caliber, of this booklet lies in its willingness to interact in a nuanced—at occasions, even critical—approach to Irigaray’s feminism.” — New Formations
“This singular quantity starts off to take account of the large impression and diversity of the paintings of Luce Irigaray. Taking as some extent of departure the major severe writings on Greek philosophy that shape the root of Irigaray’s theories of sexual distinction, the sexed physique, and writing, this anthology brings Irigaray’s Greek legacy into the current to think about feminist philosophy as a severe rereading of philosophy’s foundations. Here we see that the departures from that very important culture are as very important because the accounts we owe. Once back we see that to learn Irigaray capability studying to learn in either instructions at once. As good, we see in shiny phrases that Irigaray’s paintings poses an huge, immense problem for rethinking kin of eros and love, recrafting philosophy via new textual and corporeal practices, either embodied and critical. The quantity acknowledges Irigaray as a feminist thinker whose paintings has itself produced a magnificent legacy of various and important feedback between significant modern thinkers. This is a useful textual content for these who desire to comprehend simply how appreciably feminist proposal intervenes in questions of background, love, embodiment, and critical readings in philosophy.” — Judith Butler, writer of Frames of struggle: while Is lifestyles Grievable?
“This e-book will captivate feminist students and classicists alike, proposing the complicated landscape of an interdisciplinary learn within which the primacy of the ‘text’ (be it Irigaray’s or that of the traditional culture) is while proven and trespassed.” — Adriana Cavarero, writer of Stately our bodies: Literature, Philosophy, and the query of Gender
Read Online or Download Rewriting Difference: Luce Irigaray and 'the Greeks' (SUNY series in Gender Theory) PDF
Similar Feminism books
First variation Hardcover (1981) in excellent situation. dirt Jackst indicates enormous quantity of wear and tear alongside the perimeters, a few scuffing and tears of the canopy. even if, the particular ebook is particularly fresh & unmarked, there's just one illness within the textual content: web page 111 has a pinhead-size tear alongside the ground of the web page.
The bestselling vintage that redefined our view od the connection among good looks and feminine id. In modern day international, ladies have extra strength, felony popularity, good fortune than ever ahead of. along the obtrusive development of the women's flow, notwithstanding, author and journalist Naomi Wolf is stricken through a special type of social keep an eye on, which, she argues, might turn out simply as restrictive because the conventional photograph of homemaker and spouse.
The ebook of Germaine Greer's the feminine Eunuch in 1970 was once a landmark occasion, elevating eyebrows and ire whereas making a surprise wave of popularity in ladies all over the world with its steadfast statement that sexual liberation is the major to women's liberation. at the present time, Greer's searing exam of the oppression of ladies in modern society is either an incredible ancient list of the place we've got been and a surprisingly appropriate treatise on what nonetheless is still accomplished.
The writer of the groundbreaking paintings Slut! explores the phenomenon of slut-shaming within the age of sexting, tweeting, and “liking. ” She indicates that the sexual double general is extra harmful than ever earlier than and gives knowledge and techniques for easing its damaging results on younger women’s lives.
Additional info for Rewriting Difference: Luce Irigaray and 'the Greeks' (SUNY series in Gender Theory)
Within the Use of enjoyment Foucault writes: “There is often anything ludicrous in philosophical discourse whilst it attempts, from the surface, to dictate to others, to inform them the place their fact is and the way to ﬁnd it” (9). Philosophical discourse, Foucault argues, “is entitled to discover what can be replaced, in its personal notion, throughout the perform of an information that's international to it” (9). The resource of that modify and that perform is philosophy as “askesis—an workout of oneself within the task of concept” (9). to make sure, even though Foucault, like Irigaray, argues opposed to the monolithic wisdom of philosophical culture, his paintings has been seriously criticized by means of feminists for its masculinist philosophical bias. Feminists have came upon fault with Foucault for failing to recognize the restrictions of Greece as a ancient version for puzzling over ethics accurately as the moral practices identiﬁed by way of Foucault observe in simple terms to elite Athenian males. As Amy Richlin places it a little acerbically: “Not that girls are the one obtrusive absence in Foucault’s background; Foucault has reproduced for his readers an antiquity with out Jews. . . with out Africans, Egyptians, Semites, northern Europeans; with no kids, infants, negative humans, slaves. the entire ‘Greeks’ are Athenians and lots of the ‘Romans’ are Greeks; in lots of methods those books should not salvageable. ”20 equally, Jean Grimshaw argues that “Foucault’s paintings on ethics is disappointing. . . . it sort of feels trapped,” she maintains, “in a hugely masculinist view of ethics because the problem of a male elite to stylize their very own lives. It sees this stylized aestheticization of existence because the simply substitute to a morality in keeping with adherence to a inflexible or common code. ”21 And even supposing more moderen feminist readings of volumes and 3 of heritage of Sexuality were overwhelmingly positive,22 many feminist theorists stay ambivalent approximately Foucault’s price for moral considering. Irigaray, Ethics, and the Greeks How, then, does this photo of Foucault, ethics, and the Greeks observe to Irigaray within the context of queer concept? As in Foucault, the function of the Greeks is critical for Irigaray’s belief of the moral ﬁeld. Irigaray attracts commonly on Greek tradition as a resource of proposal and item of critique, from her deconstruction of Platonic mimesis to her confident makes use of of the tales of Antigone, Demeter, and Kore, or Orestes, Electra, and Clytemnestra. extra speciﬁcally, as lots of Irigaray’s interpreters have 124 Lynne Huffer established, the Greeks are a particularly very important resource for Irigaray’s moral considering simply because she makes use of fable as a motor vehicle for the reconstruction of a moral ﬁeld that might enable for precise sexual distinction. in regards to Irigaray, then, “weird Greek intercourse” refers to a capacious inspiration of sex-asgender and gender-as-sex—“sex” within the French experience of le sexe, as within the identify Irigaray supplies to her recognized publication, This intercourse which isn't One. 23 To ﬂesh out the significance of the Greeks for Irigaray’s ethics, allow me go back to the rubric I borrowed from Didier Eribon to caricature out Foucault’s ethics in terms of the Greek global, the place his puzzling over the Greeks was once thematically divided right into a politics of friendship and an financial system of pleasures.