By Constantine Verevis
This is often the 1st e-book to supply a entire and systematic account of the phenomenon of cinematic remaking. Drawing upon contemporary theories of style and intertextuality, Film Remakes describes remaking as either an elastic proposal and a posh scenario, one enabled and constrained through the interrelated roles and practices of undefined, critics, and audiences. This method of remaking is built throughout 3 extensive sections: the 1st bargains with problems with creation, together with trade and authors; the second one considers style, plots, and buildings; and the 3rd investigates problems with reception, together with audiences and associations.
Read or Download Film Remakes PDF
Best Film books
Parallel traces describes how post-9/11 cinema, from Spike Lee's twenty fifth Hour (2002) to Kathryn Bigelow's 0 darkish Thirty (2012), pertains to various, and competing, models folks nationwide identification within the aftermath of the September eleven terrorist assaults. The booklet combines readings of person motion pictures (World exchange heart, United ninety three, Fahrenheit 11th of September, unfastened swap) and cycles of flicks (depicting revenge, conspiracy, torture and warfare) with prolonged statement on routine issues, together with the connection among the USA and the remainder of the realm, narratives of healing restoration, questions of moral legal responsibility.
Godard: photographs, Sounds, Politics is a crucial step in making experiments in photograph and sound past the associations of cinema and tv seen. It reads the sooner movies throughout the newer paintings, concentrating on politics, expertise and sexuality. those insistent issues dominate Godard's research of our illustration within the photograph, a illustration consistently inflected via sound.
Winner, Rollins publication Award, Southwest Texas pop culture Association/American tradition organization, 2008Science fiction movie deals its audience many pleasures, now not least of that is the potential for imagining different worlds during which very assorted sorts of society exist. no longer unusually, besides the fact that, those substitute worlds usually turn into areas during which filmmakers and movie audiences can discover problems with challenge in our personal society.
Irresistibly magnetic on degree, enchanting in videos, seven instances an Academy Award nominee, Richard Burton rose from humble beginnings in Wales to turn into Hollywood's such a lot hugely paid actor and one in all England's such a lot in demand Shakespearean performers. His epic romance with Elizabeth Taylor, his mythical consuming and story-telling, his fantastic purchases (enormous diamonds, a jet, houses on numerous continents), and his huge, immense expertise saved him consistently within the public eye.
Extra info for Film Remakes
Forty four. sixty six. Quoted in Vincendeau, Jean-Pierre Melville, p. 15. sixty seven. Marie, The French New Wave, pp. 44–5. sixty eight. Vincendeau, Jean-Pierre Melville, p. 111. sixty nine. Quoted in ibid. , p. 116. 70. Ibid. seventy one. Andrew, ‘ Breathless: outdated as New’, p. thirteen. seventy two. Vincendeau, ‘Gamblers Anonymous’, p. 22. seventy three. Jordan, ‘Double Down’, p. seventy eight. seventy four. Vincendeau, ‘Gamblers Anonymous’, p. 24. seventy five. Vincendeau, Jean-Pierre Melville, p. one hundred seventy five. seventy six. Ibid. , p. 179. seventy seven. Rosenbaum, ‘International Sampler’. seventy eight. See Nogueira, Melville, p. 129. seventy nine. Rosenbaum, ‘International Sampler’. eighty. Quoted in ibid. eighty one. Milne and Narboni, Godard on Godard, p. 216. eighty two. Kline, Screening the textual content, p. 203. eighty three. Ibid. , p. 186. eighty four. Ibid. , p. 204. eighty five. Williams, ‘ Pierrot in Context’, p. 50. 86. Hillier, the hot Hollywood, p. sixty eight. 87. Carson, ‘ Breathless Diary’, p. 34. 88. Ibid. , p. 38. 89. Falkenberg, ‘ “Hollywood” and the “Art Cinema” as a Bipolar Modeling System’, p. forty four. ninety. Durham, Double Takes, pp. 49–69. ninety one. Carson, ‘ Breathless Diary’, p. 35. ninety two. Durham, Double Takes, p. fifty eight. ninety three. Ibid. , p. sixty five. ninety four. Mazdon, Encore Hollywood, pp. 85–7. ninety five. Andrew, ‘ Breathless: outdated as New’, p. 19. ninety six. Ibid. , p. 18, emphasis further. ninety seven. Clarkson, Quentin Tarantino, pp. 297–300. end: Remaking every little thing Quentin says: ‘It [was] a film-geek factor to do’. A twenty-two-year-old movie tuition graduate, with the ‘cool-sounding identify’ of Mr White, entered Who Do you think that You’ re Fooling? , a quick movie evaluating Quentin Tarantino’s Reservoir canine (1992) and Ringo Lam’s urban on hearth (1987), within the 1995 manhattan Underground movie pageant. 1 The query of the similarities among the 2 motion pictures had already surfaced within the pages of Empire and picture risk magazines, and Tarantino had defended his movie in (what White describes as) the ‘Great Poster safeguard’ on the 1994 pageant at Cannes. requested no matter if Reservoir canine and Ringo Lam’s movie – the tale of an undercover cop who had infiltrated a band of thieves getting ready to rob a jewelry shop – have been a similar, Tarantino spoke back: I enjoyed urban on fireplace. I received the poster framed in my residence, so it’s a superb motion picture . . . I thieve from each motion picture made . . . If my paintings has something it’s simply because I’m taking from this and from that, piecing them jointly. If humans don’t love it, difficult titty, don’t move see it. 2 ‘The Ringo Lam factor’ used to be extra broadly stated in books at the existence and films of Quentin Tarantino – Wensley Clarkson’s Quentin Tarantino: taking pictures from the Hip and Jami Bernard’s Quentin Tarantino: the guy and His video clips (both 1995) – that seemed at a time whilst Tarantino had basically as many movies (as director) to his credits. Tarantino had exploded directly to the filmmaking scene in October 1992 with the discharge of the noir-inflected Reservoir canine, and with the follow-up of his monu-mentally profitable (and influential) Pulp Fiction years later (October 1994) he grew to become a reason célèbre. Pulp Fiction used to be followed by means of a media typhoon, scary experiences, articles and interviews in such guides because the Face and Grand road, and a print symposium in Artforum. three As 174 Peter Biskind famous, the French specifically embraced Tarantino, the cinephile’s cinephile: The French enjoyed Reservoir canine – it was once like a wise bomb lasered into the center in their infatuation with the darkish stars of yankee B videos.