By Ernesto Laclau, Judith Butler
What's the modern legacy of Gramsci’s inspiration of Hegemony? How can universality be reformulated now that its spurious types were so completely criticized? during this ground-breaking undertaking, Judith Butler, Ernesto Laclau and Slavoj Žižek interact in a discussion on principal questions of up to date philosophy and politics. Their essays, equipped as separate contributions that reply to each other, diversity over the Hegelian legacy in modern serious idea, the theoretical dilemmas of multiculturalism, the universalism-versus-particularism debate, the concepts of the Left in a globalized economic system, and the relative advantages of post-structuralism and Lacanian psychoanalysis for a serious social idea. whereas the rigor and intelligence with which those writers technique their paintings is ambitious, Contingency, Hegemony, Universality merits also from their transparent feel of power and pleasure in a revealing and sometimes unpredictable trade.
Read or Download Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left (Radical Thinkers) PDF
Similar Critical Theory books
Roland Barthes used to be the best determine of French Structuralism, the theoretical stream of the Nineteen Sixties which revolutionized the examine of literature and tradition, in addition to background and psychoanalysis. yet Barthes used to be a guy who disliked orthodoxies. His transferring positions and theoretical pursuits make him tough to know and examine.
Serious thought emerged within the Nineteen Twenties from the paintings of the Frankfurt college, the circle of German-Jewish teachers who sought to diagnose-and, if in any respect attainable, cure-the ills of society, fairly fascism and capitalism. during this e-book, Stephen Eric Bronner presents sketches of prime representatives of the severe culture (such as George Lukács and Ernst Bloch, Theodor Adorno and Walter Benjamin, Herbert Marcuse and Jurgen Habermas) in addition to lots of its seminal texts and empirical investigations.
Jacques Derrida is, within the phrases of the hot York instances, "perhaps the world's most renowned philosopher—if no longer the single well-known thinker. " He frequently provokes controversy once his identify is pointed out. yet he additionally conjures up the consideration that comes from an illustrious profession, and, between many that have been his colleagues and friends, he encouraged friendship.
"The depression technology" is Gillian Rose s research into TheodorAdorno s paintings and legacy. Rose uncovers the solidarity discernableamong the various fragments of Adorno s oeuvre, and argues that hisinfluence has been to show Marxism right into a look for variety. The makes an attempt of Adorno, Lukacs and Benjamin to improve a Marxisttheory of tradition focused at the notion of reification are contrasted, and the ways that the concept that of reification has come to bemisused are uncovered.
Additional info for Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left (Radical Thinkers)
First, that I believe such a lot of what he does out o/ Hegel's texts. moment, that i don't imagine that he's projecting into these texts a sequence of concerns extraneous to the texts themselves. T h e y basically practice to them. So how do I take care of this obvious contradiction on my half? i'm on no account ready to concede something in regards to the panlogistic nature of Hegel's highbrow undertaking. besides the fact that, we must always now not take the observe for the deed. because the optimum element of m o d e r n rationalism, Hegel claimed, for cause, a job the latter had by no means claimed for itself long ago: to reconsider, by way of its personal logical transitions, the totality of the ontological differences that the philosophical culture had discerned in the actual. this provides way to a double circulate: if cause, at the one hand, has hegemonized the complete realm of transformations, the latter, at the different, couldn't steer clear of contaminating the previous. such a lot of dialectical transitions are spurious logical transitions. because the 19th century, feedback of Hegel has taken the shape of exclaiming that lots of his deductions derive their obvious acceptability from illegitimate empirical assumptions smuggled into the argument (Trendelenburg, for instance). This was once the most line of Schelling's feedback of Hegel: he tried to teach that, except m a n y inconsistent deductions in his good judgment, the complete venture of a presuppositionless philosophy used to be incorrect, for it may well now not even begin with no accepting the legislation of good judgment and a rationalist method of strategies (as innate ideas), a dogmatic metaphysical realism which begins from 'Being' as a dull objectivity, a n d language as a pre-constituted medium. 1 five by contrast imaginative and prescient, Schelling asserts that Philosophy can't be presuppositionless, a n d that h u m a n lifestyles is a kick off point extra fundamental than the concept that. Feuerbach, Kierkegaard and Engels all of whom attended Schelling's classes - accredited his simple feedback, and built their very own specific techniques, giving precedence to 'existence' over 'reason'. In a few experience, it needs to be approved that Hegel represents the closure of the metaphysical culture which all started with Plato. Schelling's 'positive philosophy' is a brand new starting, within which the entire of latest inspiration used to be to engulf itself. Now, i would like to emphasize that, in my departure from dialectics, i don't take the Schellingian highway. T h e 'discourse' strategy that I soak up relation to the 'social development of truth' prevents me from accepting any sharp contrast among lifestyles and realization. this doesn't m e a n , even if, that i feel approach of conceptually worthy transitions is the one substitute to an o p a q u e empiricity. T h e major hassle that stands within the method of a in simple terms speculative dialectics is, in my opinion, the position of standard language within the dialectical transitions. allow us to quote in complete the passage, in Hegel's common sense, the place he attempts to take on this challenge: Philosophy has definitely the right to choose between the language of universal existence that's made for the realm of pictorial pondering, such expressions as appear to approximate to the determinations of the thought.